This site provides the overview. The essay makes the argument. The implementation architecture is the engineering behind it — how it would actually be administered, scored, and defended. The plan is conceptual and illustrates mechanisms to move the RSC from concept to legislation.
The full argument — the history behind the corporate charter, the constitutional predicate, the mechanism, and the case for why the tax code should stop treating productive and extractive corporations identically.
"Extractive capitalism is self-terminating. The Restored Social Compact is how you save capitalism from its own worst impulse."
Download PDFThe engineering behind the essay — the commission structure, the seven-pillar scoring methodology, the rate structure, and an honest accounting of where the framework is strongest and where it's still being tested.
"A corporation exists only because the state created it. The state created it on behalf of the people. The people are entitled to define the terms under which their creation operates. The Social Compact Score is those terms, made explicit."
Download PDFHow this moves from framework to law — the institutional roster, the functions each partner supplies, and the phased path to a bipartisan sponsor group.
"The RSC is not about the deficit. Nevertheless, the deficit will tag along tightly. In fact, the RSC is the mechanism that makes the deficit-reduction case real and politically credible rather than aspirational."
Download PDFA one-page summary built for sharing — the fastest way to hand someone the idea before they decide whether to go deeper.
"Should taxpayers fund extractive employment?"
Download PDF