A federal corporate tax framework

We tax good corporate behavior and subsidize the bad kind.

The Restored Social Compact ties a corporation's federal tax rate to seven measurable pillars of public benefit — built on existing federal structures, with only the limited new machinery needed to calculate a rate from facts already disclosed.

The social compact score — select an example
Federal rate for this example
Illustrative examples — not audited disclosures of any actual company.
§1

The problem

Consider Costco. It pays a starting wage well above the federal minimum, extends healthcare and retirement benefits deep into its hourly workforce, and does it while outperforming Walmart — its closest direct competitor, built on the opposite model — by several long-term measures. Costco already operates exactly the way this framework is designed to reward.

Under the current tax code, Costco and Walmart pay exactly the same federal rate. The tax code cannot tell the difference between a company that invests in its workers and one that doesn't. That isn't a market outcome. It's a policy choice — and it's the wrong one.

§2

The mechanism

In 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that the power to tax is the power to destroy. The inverse has gone almost entirely unused: the power not to tax is the power to build. Corporations respond to the tax code with more precision than almost any other actor in the economy. The Restored Social Compact uses that precision on purpose.

Every year, a corporation's own required disclosures are scored across seven pillars. The score sets its federal tax rate — the standard 28–32%, down to a floor near 15% for the highest performers. The corporation never characterizes its own behavior. It reports facts already required of it. The statute does the rest. Benefits accrue to companies who are socially beneficial.

The federal debt crossed $40 trillion in August 2026, faster than even recent projections anticipated. The storm is brewing — it’s ominous and likely fierce. The Restored Social Compact is the raft that carries the party that makes the hard choice to safety, a way to propose revenue reform without campaigning on the pain of that tax increase. Defending a reduction for good actors is a fundamentally different proposition than defending an across-the-board hike. Aboard that raft, political survival and doing the right thing are simply good strategy.

§3

The coalition of winners

States

Direct governance authority over the charters they grant, restored to the level of government that created the corporation in the first place.

Businesses already doing this right

A real, measurable tax advantage over the competitors who've been undercutting them by externalizing costs.

Conservatives

No mandate telling a business how to operate, no compliance department, no inspector. The only new machinery is the minimum required to calculate a rate from facts a company already discloses.

Progressives

Wage, benefits, and environmental standards built directly into the tax code, not dependent on a new spending bill every year.

Environmental organizations

A fiscal mechanism behind standards that have so far depended on voluntary corporate commitment.

Communities and workers

The direct beneficiaries of a tax code that finally distinguishes who's earning their privileges from who's extracting them.

The corporation will not restore the social compact voluntarily. The last fifty years have shown that clearly. But the corporation is exquisitely sensitive to the tax code, and the tax code is an instrument of democratic will. The power not to tax is the power to build. It is time to use it.